<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inside HBS &#187; case discussions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidehbs.com/tag/case-discussions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidehbs.com</link>
	<description>Harvard Business School, MBA Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LCA: Therapy for Business Leaders</title>
		<link>http://www.insidehbs.com/lca-therapy-for-business-leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidehbs.com/lca-therapy-for-business-leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidehbs.com/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LCA (Leadership and Corporate Accountability) is easily my least favorite class this semester.  It’s basically Business Ethics – which makes for perfectly fascinating bar conversation, but impossibly aggravating 90-person case discussions.  Part of it has to do with the way &#8230; <a href="http://www.insidehbs.com/lca-therapy-for-business-leaders/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">LCA (Leadership and Corporate Accountability) is easily my least favorite class this semester.<span>  </span>It’s basically Business Ethics – which makes for perfectly fascinating bar conversation, but <strong>impossibly aggravating</strong> 90-person case discussions.<span>  </span>Part of it has to do with the way it’s taught.<span>  </span>I think our professor was a therapist in another life, and he teaches the course like we should bare our souls with a healthy dose of group hugs and shoulder-crying. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">More it’s just the lack of structure that bothers me.<span>  </span>The case method is inherently fluid and without answers – which is a great thing (!): there’d be no point having a discussion if there were only one answer.<span>  </span>The problem with LCA is there are also no correct processes, no correct frameworks, and essentially, no way to effectively compare &amp; contrast opinions. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In most case discussions, you think X and I think Y.<span>  </span>Fine.<span>  </span>We can discuss the pros / cons of each and possibly arrive at a compromise or at least fully evaluated strategic options.<span>  </span>In LCA, you think X and I think Y.<span>  </span>We smile and nod congenially, and someone else chimes in that they think Z.<span>  </span>Oh, and A.<span>  </span>Or maybe C?<span>  </span>Does it matter?<span>  </span>Not really.<span>  </span>Where were we again? <span> </span>Exactly.<span>  </span>Annoyed?<span>  </span>Me too. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Again, this would be a great course if the class size were only five people, but it falls flat on its face with ninety. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidehbs.com/lca-therapy-for-business-leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

